Site Notice

We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed.
Please no leaked content less than one year old, or videos of leaks.
Content copied verbatim from other websites or wikis will be removed.

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Wiki Infobox"

From NintendoWiki, your source on Nintendo information. By fans, for fans.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:OK, thank you for the suggestion. But, out of curiosity, why would we want to do that? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 23:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC).
 
:OK, thank you for the suggestion. But, out of curiosity, why would we want to do that? {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 23:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC).
 
::Because showing "URL | URL", besides for looking rather strange and confusing, doesn't actually display the URL, which kind of misses the point of having an URL section... --[[Special:Contributions/75.126.149.175|75.126.149.175]] 23:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 
::Because showing "URL | URL", besides for looking rather strange and confusing, doesn't actually display the URL, which kind of misses the point of having an URL section... --[[Special:Contributions/75.126.149.175|75.126.149.175]] 23:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 +
:::Ah, OK. That makes sense. I will edit it now. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 02:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC).

Revision as of 02:54, 14 December 2010

Suggestion

Suggestion: change | style="background:#FFFFFF; border-bottom: 1px solid #{{{{{colorscheme|Nintendo}}} 1st color}};" | [{{{url}}} URL] to | style="background:#FFFFFF; border-bottom: 1px solid #{{{{{colorscheme|Nintendo}}} 1st color}};" | {{{url}}} . --75.126.149.175 15:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

OK, thank you for the suggestion. But, out of curiosity, why would we want to do that? Tacopill (Talk) 23:13, 12 December 2010 (UTC).
Because showing "URL | URL", besides for looking rather strange and confusing, doesn't actually display the URL, which kind of misses the point of having an URL section... --75.126.149.175 23:59, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, OK. That makes sense. I will edit it now. Tacopill (Talk) 02:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC).