| Site Notice |
|---|
|
We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:SmashWiki"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) (→About the missing series logos) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
About the missing series logos... they don't actually exist. Each one of them are a standalone game, in-which means that no series logo is going to be available. Unless we want to loosen the definition of "series" and allow stand alone games to be single-member series. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 21:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC). | About the missing series logos... they don't actually exist. Each one of them are a standalone game, in-which means that no series logo is going to be available. Unless we want to loosen the definition of "series" and allow stand alone games to be single-member series. {{User:Tacopill/sig}} 21:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC). | ||
:Sorta confused here; why can we not have pictures of them, even if they're not series? We wouldn't have to cover them as series, we could just put the logo of the stand-alone game there and link to its article. The section doesn't even say anything about "series", it simply speaks of "coverage" and "areas of focus". There's nothing in there that implies that everything in the coverage section would have to be a series or treated like one.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 22:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | :Sorta confused here; why can we not have pictures of them, even if they're not series? We wouldn't have to cover them as series, we could just put the logo of the stand-alone game there and link to its article. The section doesn't even say anything about "series", it simply speaks of "coverage" and "areas of focus". There's nothing in there that implies that everything in the coverage section would have to be a series or treated like one.--[[User:Vellidragon|Vellidragon]] 22:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Because, the template used by the editor, creates wanted file links that look for files called <code><x series logo.png></code>; implying, at least to me, that they were looking for it. | ||
| + | ::If the wiki covers the game to an in-depth degree, then they can transclude the game's logo, if available. | ||
| + | ::{{User:Tacopill/sig}} 00:00, 18 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 18 April 2012
About the missing series logos
About the missing series logos... they don't actually exist. Each one of them are a standalone game, in-which means that no series logo is going to be available. Unless we want to loosen the definition of "series" and allow stand alone games to be single-member series. Tacopill (Talk) 21:40, 17 April 2012 (UTC).
- Sorta confused here; why can we not have pictures of them, even if they're not series? We wouldn't have to cover them as series, we could just put the logo of the stand-alone game there and link to its article. The section doesn't even say anything about "series", it simply speaks of "coverage" and "areas of focus". There's nothing in there that implies that everything in the coverage section would have to be a series or treated like one.--Vellidragon 22:45, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because, the template used by the editor, creates wanted file links that look for files called
<x series logo.png>; implying, at least to me, that they were looking for it. - If the wiki covers the game to an in-depth degree, then they can transclude the game's logo, if available.
- Tacopill (Talk) 00:00, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Because, the template used by the editor, creates wanted file links that look for files called
