| Site Notice |
|---|
|
We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed. |
Develop 100
The Develop 100 is a yearly list published by Develop that lists of the top one-hundred video game developers ranked by the amount of revenue taken in through video game sales in the United Kingdom. Its first release was in 2005, and since then it has been release annually.[1] In each publication of the list, a profile of the studio is included stating what has made the company more successful or less successful than previous years. Occasionally Develop 100 includes the company's revenue as well as which of their games were the most successful.
Rankings
In 2005, Nintendo was ranked twenty-eight.[1]
In 2007, Nintendo lost to EA Canada, being placed at second place.[2]
In 2008, Nintendo was ranked first.[3][4]
In 2009, Nintendo was in second place, topped by Blizzard Entertainment.[5]
In 2010, Nintendo again was the most successful studio.[1]
In 2011, Nintendo ranks first place for the second year in a row.[6][7]
|
This article is a stub. You can help NintendoWiki by expanding it. |
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 Bennallack, Owain. Develop: Develop 100: The top ten, dated 2010/5/7, retrieved 2010/12/16.
- ↑ Boyes, Emma of GameSpot UK. GameSpot: EA Canada tops Develop 100, dated 2007/3/4, retrieved 2010/12/16.
- ↑ Boyes, Emma of GameSpot UK. GameSpot: Nintendo tops Develop 100, dated 2008/3/10, retrieved 2010/12/16.
- ↑ Fear, Ed. Develop: Nintendo reclaims dev chart top spot, dated 2008/5/13, retrieved 2010/12/16.
- ↑ Coby, Alex Sassoon of GameSpot UK. GameSpot: Blizzard conquers Develop 100, dated 2009/5/11, retrieved 2010/12/16.
- ↑ Gamasutra: [PRESS RELEASE] DEVELOP 100 NAMES WORLD'S BEST GAMES DEVELOPERS, dated 2011/6/3, retrieved 2011/6/3.
- ↑ French, Michael. Develop: Develop 100: It's here, dated 2011/6/2, retrieved 2011/6/3.
External links
 |
This article has been tagged as a featured stub. As per Featured Stubs, it has been requested by someone in the community to be the focus on editing efforts to improve quality, structure, information, etc. | |
