Site Notice |
---|
We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed. |
File talk:Right Arrow.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Licensing and Other Things
Hey, where are the licensing templates? - GP talk 09:28, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
Oh, also, is this okay? Just used what I had on my computer; Tango's was too small. Are we going for a certain colour? - GP talk 09:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- The license are available in the drop down box on the uploaded page, as pictured to the right. Or, you may look at this related category.
- It's fine to upload this. One day, however, I do plan to replace it with something more original. Still, it will do for now. Thank you for uploading it.
- Tacopill (Talk) 23:23, 10 March 2011 (UTC).
- The templates in that category indicate the content of the file: in some cases it's always going to be, say, fair use, but in others, the template either assumes the file is copyrighted or gives a list of licenses it might fall under. This is ambiguous and not very flexible: if license is not defined by the content, it should be clearly stated on the description page what the distribution terms of the file are. Take this image: the obvious template, according to its content, is "Wiki File", but that assumes fair use, which is not the case.
- Also, what's with the silliness on
{{License/Wiki File}}
? And{{License/Copyright Nintendo}}
is a different style to the others and overlaps with a lot of their use-cases. - GP talk 09:03, 12 March 2011 (UTC)- If it's ambiguous, wouldn't that make it more flexable? :D. ALso, how would it a "Wiki File". It was not generated to be a wiki exclusive, such as Template:File or Template:File was, i believe to be.
- As for it's sillyness, It was designed to be a mock template of the fair use templates, since anything created exclusively for the wiki wouldn't be subject to copyright, unless they filed for it.
- Anyway, would you do me a huge favor and create the missing licence templates, and fix the one's we currently have?
- Tacopill (Talk) 23:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC).
- Also, what's with the silliness on