Site Notice

We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed.
Please no leaked content less than one year old, or videos of leaks.
Content copied verbatim from other websites or wikis will be removed.

Template talk:Clear

From NintendoWiki, your source on Nintendo information. By fans, for fans.
Revision as of 21:39, 6 March 2011 by Greenpickle (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Missing closing tag. Oh, and why the {{void}}? (And why its use everywhere else? It seems pretty pointless to me.) - GP talk 15:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

the ifeq condition is broken up like this:
  1. if {{{1}}} = (i.e. nothing)
then, output "both"
else, output the value of {{{1}}}
As for it's use, it clears out all the neiboring content in the cell or div. To the left, if 1 equal to "left"; to the right; if 1 equal to "right"; and both directions if 1 is undefined, blank or equal to "both".
Tacopill (Talk) 16:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC).
Yes, I know how #if and the HTML clear attribute work, but what do they have to do with the use of template:void here? - GP talk
My guess would be, to capture all the possible null values that could go in {{{1}}}, which maybe an improvement over #if: (without eq). I'm not sure on this, however, since i didn't design it. I brought it over from Lylat Wiki, and the person who brought or created it there isn't currently active, there or here. Tacopill (Talk) 05:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC).
No, what I'm saying is, why use template:void, when it has absolutely nothing in it to transclude, and removing it would give exactly the same effect? - GP talk
As i've said... I don't know. To me,
{{#if:{{{1}}}|{{void}}|....|....}}
seems more complete, than,
{{#if:{{{1}}}||....|....}}
Even if it doesn't do so functionality. Then again, it might just be my currently-undiagnosed OCD....or my perfectionism....or some other bizzare reason.
Anyway, if it's really important... you can remove it. Or request that i remove it, if you can't.
Tacopill (Talk) 21:15, 6 March 2011 (UTC).
No, I was just wondering if there was a reason. It's a pretty crazy thing. - GP talk 21:39, 6 March 2011 (UTC)