| Site Notice |
|---|
|
We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed. |
User talk:HavocReaper48
I am doing that because Super Mario Wiki has longer article :3 Slipknot Darkrai 18:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I don't think it should matter on the length of the article. Donkey Kong Wiki is more focused on
, so they should get more traffic on Donkey Kong-related articles, in my opinion. Tacopill (Talk) 23:36, 12 December 2010 (UTC).
...look Darkrai, I know you're still upset about the move, and you had a lot of time to speak up about it, but, deal with it. What don't you understand about moving content elsewhere under the same license? None of DKWikia's work is copyrighted. And you still take images and stuff to Wikia without accreditation. I'm surprised you even set foot here. The community has moved, and so should you. HavocReaper48 02:04, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
- I am upset because I don't know when the community will delete all of the DK Wikia revisions and because no one is moving back to DK Wikia (original one). When will you do it? Slipknot Darkrai 15:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
- The idea of keeping the Wikia revisions is to credit everybody who actually made those edits. I wouldn't like my contribution appearing somewhere without my name on it. Malake256 00:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- Page history much? HavocReaper48 18:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
- The idea of keeping the Wikia revisions is to credit everybody who actually made those edits. I wouldn't like my contribution appearing somewhere without my name on it. Malake256 00:19, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
- I am upset because I don't know when the community will delete all of the DK Wikia revisions and because no one is moving back to DK Wikia (original one). When will you do it? Slipknot Darkrai 15:33, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
