Site Notice

We have a limited coverage policy. Please check our coverage page to see which articles are allowed.
Please no leaked content less than one year old, or videos of leaks.
Content copied verbatim from other websites or wikis will be removed.

Difference between revisions of "Nintendo in historical research"

From NintendoWiki, your source on Nintendo information. By fans, for fans.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Law)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
*[[DMA Design Limited v. Pixar Animation Studios]]: After the [[Nintendo]] published [[Super Nintendo Entertainment System]] game [[Uniracers]] was released, Pixar Animation Studios claimed that the unicycle design was an infringement of the unicycle featured in the 1987 short film [[wikipedia:Red's Dream|Red's Dream]]. Pixar Animation Studios won the case, meaning Nintendo had to cease production of new Uniracers games.
 
*[[DMA Design Limited v. Pixar Animation Studios]]: After the [[Nintendo]] published [[Super Nintendo Entertainment System]] game [[Uniracers]] was released, Pixar Animation Studios claimed that the unicycle design was an infringement of the unicycle featured in the 1987 short film [[wikipedia:Red's Dream|Red's Dream]]. Pixar Animation Studios won the case, meaning Nintendo had to cease production of new Uniracers games.
 +
 +
*[[LegendOfZelda.com lawsuit]]: This case involved a popular and detailed [[The Legend of Zelda series]] website, which would receive a take down notice.
  
 
*[[Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.]]: Following the release of the [[wikipedia:Game Genie|Game Genie]], Nintendo of America unsuccessfully attempted to sue Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc., arguing that the Game Genie allowed for 'derivative works' of video games.
 
*[[Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc. v. Nintendo of America, Inc.]]: Following the release of the [[wikipedia:Game Genie|Game Genie]], Nintendo of America unsuccessfully attempted to sue Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc., arguing that the Game Genie allowed for 'derivative works' of video games.
 +
 +
*[[Nintendo and video game emulation cases]]
  
 
*[[Nintendo of America, Inc. v. NTDEC]]: This case involved NTDEC ("Nintendo Electronic Co."), who infringed on the Nintendo trademark and produced pirated [[wikipedia:Taiwan|Taiwanese]] Nintendo games. When these games were distributed to the [[wikipedia:United States|United States]], it lead to a lawsuit which Nintendo of America won.
 
*[[Nintendo of America, Inc. v. NTDEC]]: This case involved NTDEC ("Nintendo Electronic Co."), who infringed on the Nintendo trademark and produced pirated [[wikipedia:Taiwan|Taiwanese]] Nintendo games. When these games were distributed to the [[wikipedia:United States|United States]], it lead to a lawsuit which Nintendo of America won.
Line 19: Line 23:
 
*[[Seattle Mariners]] originally formed following a lawsuit before eventually being purchased by [[Nintendo]].{{which}}
 
*[[Seattle Mariners]] originally formed following a lawsuit before eventually being purchased by [[Nintendo]].{{which}}
 
*[[Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.]]: Universal City Studios, Inc. unsuccessfully claimed that Nintendo's game [[Donkey Kong (game)|Donkey Kong]] was an infringement of [[wikipedia:King Kong|King Kong]]. The ruling was that King Kong's plot/characters were in [[wikipedia:public domain|public domain]], so Nintendo won the case. It is also considered that the namesake of the [[Kirby series|Kirby]] is inspired by [[John Kirby]]; an attorney for Nintendo during this case.
 
*[[Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd.]]: Universal City Studios, Inc. unsuccessfully claimed that Nintendo's game [[Donkey Kong (game)|Donkey Kong]] was an infringement of [[wikipedia:King Kong|King Kong]]. The ruling was that King Kong's plot/characters were in [[wikipedia:public domain|public domain]], so Nintendo won the case. It is also considered that the namesake of the [[Kirby series|Kirby]] is inspired by [[John Kirby]]; an attorney for Nintendo during this case.
 
 
{{stub}}
 
{{stub}}
 
{{Nintendo}}
 
{{Nintendo}}
 
[[Category:Nintendo]]
 
[[Category:Nintendo]]

Revision as of 15:25, 31 December 2019

This article is about Nintendo in historical research.

Journalism

Law

  • Nintendo of America, Inc. v. NTDEC: This case involved NTDEC ("Nintendo Electronic Co."), who infringed on the Nintendo trademark and produced pirated Taiwanese Nintendo games. When these games were distributed to the United States, it lead to a lawsuit which Nintendo of America won.
NintendoWiki logo.png This article is a stub. You can help NintendoWiki by expanding it.


Nintendo logo.png
1st & 2nd Party / Owned
Internal divisions
Subsidiaries
Owned / Affiliated Seattle Mariners* • The Pokémon Company • Warpstar Inc.
* – Former / Defunct
3rd Parties / Partners
8-4 • AlphaDream* • Ambrella* • Argonaut Games* • Arika • Artoon* • Arzest • AS Tokyo Studios • Bandai Namco • Capcom • Camelot • Cing* • Creatures Inc. • DeNA • DigiNin* • DigitalScape • Eighting • Flagship* • Fuse Games* • Game Freak • Ganbarion • Genius Sonority • Good-Feel • Grezzo • HAL Laboratory • Hatena • Hudson Soft* • indieszero • iNiS • Intelligent Systems • Jamsworks • Jupiter • Koei Tecmo • Kuju • Left Field Productions* • Level-5 • Mistwalker • Monster Games • Noise • Paon • PlatinumGames • Q-Games • Rare* • Red Entertainment • Sega (Atlus) • Sora Ltd. • skip • Softnica • Spike Chunsoft • Square Enix • St.GIGA* • Syn Sophia • TOSE • Treasure • Vanpool* • Vitei
* – Former / Defunct
Key employees
Presidents
Managers, etc. Internal
Subsidiaries
  • NNSD: Yusuke Beppu
  • Monolith Soft: Hirohide Sugiura, Tetsuya Takahashi
  • 1-Up Studio: Gen Kadoi
  • ND Cube: Hidetoshi Endo
  • Retro: Michael Kelbaugh
  • NERD: Alexandre Delattre